Seek Receptivity: G2
Dyads
For combining adjacent levels , the next higher level adding the quality of being convincing to to g1-fervour.
to persist and have influence, it is essential that it strikes some chord in wider society. So all who work to impact on societal institutions by the public. This appears to be provided byis a response to the generation of social pressure.
The dyads reveal different forms of pressure within the institution:
- In the lower 2 dyads, the focus is more specific and immediate—via and .
- In the middle 2 dyads, the focus is on an overall picture—via and .
- In the upper 2 dyads, the focus is more controversial and exposing—generating and .
Forms of Pressure
Advocacy combines L1 and L2:
advocacy of , at least desirable for those whose are at last being fervently served, and potentially viewed similarly by others if the are convincing enough.
isProposals combine L2 and L3:
proposals, which can be called . Still, the are fervently presented, and likely to be viewed positively by others if the are convincing enough.
are more balancedExplanations combine L3 and L4:
explanation for a current situation or crisis. The offered is fervently defended, and will likely be accepted or even viewed sympathetically by others if the is convincing.
is the formation of that are created to serve as an
Illustrations combine L4 and L5:
illustration of the of the institution, based on that is fervently promoted, and justified using that are convincing.
is anQuestions combine L5 and L6:
questions by creating that force attention on with fervour, and do so in a way that makes for a convincing .
generatesSurprises combine L6 and L7:
surprises in the form of a based on fervent , while convincingly.
produces
Schema
Function:
To enable accounts for the public that integrate a meaningful picture with a specific justification .
Quality: Convincing i.e. ensuring that beliefs give strength to any suggestion or proposition related to the institution.
Integration within the Group: Situations are examined and described in ways that justify a particular account..
Integration across the Groups: Progression of articulation from specific and pressing, through descriptive, to being exposing and awakening.
Psychological Correlate: Making sense of an institutional matter despite the potential for disagreement with others.
Institutional Tension: Formation of factions, often class-based or generational, that subject the institution to scrutiny and exposure, both fair and unfair.
Practical Implications: The public becomes aware of institutional issues that require addressing.
Transition
The 6 G2 groups appear as concerns that are widely enough appreciated that they can persist in society. Each of the accounts is a stand-alone matter that may hold the public's attention and provide fodder for the media. However, on their own, they are unlikely to bring about any change.
Some sort of consolidation and systematization is required to generate a socially-significant phenomenon which can be disseminated to generate an impact.
This appears to be possible by the addition of a third level to form G3-triads, each of which towards an institutional condition.
- Continue with the Stances-G3 Triads.
- Go to the review section to see the full picture in more detail.
Originally posted: 18-Mar-2024.